| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Extreme Weather Events Are Killing Fewer People Than Ever Before
September 26, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Reason FoundationExtreme Weather Events Are Killing Fewer People Than Ever Before
The worldwide death rate from weather happenings has dropped over 98 percent since the 1920s
September 22, 2011
Despite concerns about global warming and a large increase in the number of reported storms and droughts, the world’s death rate from extreme weather events was lower from 2000 to 2010 than it has been in any decade since 1900, according to a new Reason Foundation study….(Full Story) *
So, why all this doom and gloom, the hype and hysteria about the ostensible catastrophic, man-made global warming?
__________
* Indur M. Goklany is a science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior, where he holds the position of Assistant Director of Programs, Science and Technology Policy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indur_M._Goklany

The graph identified here was provided in a posting by Indur Goklany at http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/25/the-amazing-decline-in-deaths-from-extreme-weather-in-an-era-of-global-warming-19002010/.
Posted in Propaganda debunked, Corruption & Fraud, Climate Change | Print | No Comments »
Four fatal pieces of evidence that disprove man-made global warming
September 22, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Dr David Evans: Four fatal pieces of evidence (disproving the anthropogenic global warming nonsense)
Dr David Evans lays out four crucial pieces of evidence, and calls for a debate with Prof Andrew Pitman. But the evidence is so unarguably strong for skeptics, we know that the name-calling-team-who-want-our-money will do anything to avoid a public debate. If the evidence is “overwhelming” why are they so unwilling to explain it? — Jo Nova
(Full Story )
Posted in Shell CCS Project, Taxes, Propaganda debunked, Corruption & Fraud | Print | No Comments »
Abuse of the elderly
September 12, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
This blog entry is about abuse and neglect of the elderly by relatives and, perhaps even more importantly, elderly abuse — often fatal — by governments.
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’
– Ronald Reagan
In connection with the topic of this entry, there is an equally hard-hitting reality:
How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have an ungrateful child.
— King Lear. Shakespeare
Be careful that things such as those reported in the following article will not happen to you.
The Abuse of Grandma B – How Corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the Elderly
The Abuse of Grandma B – a sad story told by Peter Hofschröer
Grandma B is now 82 years old. She is wheelchair-bound and very frail. The past three years of her life have been horrendous. She lost her husband of 60 years, but that was the easy part. She has also been the victim of sustained and systematic abuse in which she has been defrauded of her house, subjected to threats and harassment because she will not hand over her life savings to her abusers, then unlawfully evicted from her house and stranded abroad, with her abusers trying, fortunately unsuccessfully, to fraudulently sell her house.
You may well ask who would do such an awful thing to a little, old lady in a wheelchair. Sadly, most abuse takes place within the family and this is very much the case here. The main abusers are Grandma B’s older son, his wife and her two adult grandchildren. (More)
The article chronicles the abuse and defrauding of Grandma B by one of her sons, his wife and some adult grandchildren, but that is not the least of the story. The son and his children are conspiring with the governments to defraud Grandma B of her assets, and avariety of government departments and agencies have become willing and eager accomplices in a whole slew of crimes directed agaist Grandma B.
Sadly the abuse of Grandma B is not an isolated incident. It is endemic in many nations.
About 20 years ago, the administrator of hospital in Alberta, who used to stop by at our place on the way home from from work, told me: “Walter, today I found 30 healthy people in the hospital.” He waited for a reaction, and I said, “Well, that should not be out of the ordinary. After all, the purpose of a hospital is to produce healthy people.”
He responded, “Yes, and then those healthy people should be send back home, but in this case some of them have been residing as healthy people, in the hospital, for years, while the hospital earned $1,500 a day for each of them.”
How is something like that possible or even justified? Why would those people wish to reside in a hospital, even though they were healthy? Our neighbour explained that in every case the relatives of those healthy “patients”, who at one time had legitimate reasons for being in the hospital, found that, when they wished to go home, there was no home for them to go back to. Their relatives had finagled to sell their homes and assets during those people’s convalescence in the hospital.
Our neighbour eventually managed to find more suitable accommodation for those 30 defrauded people, but he agreed that such abuse of the elderly is endemic.
You may wonder what happens in a hospital that needs the beds occupied by healthy “patients” when the demand for hospital services exceeds the supply, such as when the government implement cost-saving measures that involves cuts in health-care funding.
Some years ago the circumstances surrounding that issue in the largest hospital district in London, England, attracted considerable media attention. The complaints were that elderly people would enter hospital with minor complaints, such as an arthritic knee, and leave in short order in a pine box, the consequence of the solution to the problem: “Sedate, withhold food and liquids.”
In an interview by the media, the hospital administrators response was: “What do you expect us to do? We need the beds.”
Although euthanasia of the elderly is illegal in England, it is alive and well there.
You may think that the problem does not occur where you live, but consider this situation.
“Each year, an estimated 10,000 patients die in Canadian hospitals as a result of staff errors, while a further 20,000 die from “nonpreventable adverse events,” such as hospital infections and unexpected drug complications. Some research indicates that another 20,000, give or take, may die of unforeseen or preventable causes while under care outside hospitals.
These staggering figures are extrapolated from data collected in the United States, Britain and Australia, but are widely accepted as reasonable approximations. In 1999 the U.S. Institute of Medicine estimated that up to 98,000 Americans a year die in hospital due to medical errors, and another million are injured. A 2000 study found that adverse events cause patient harm in ten percent of hospital admissions in Britain, amounting to 850,000 times a year.” –Tragedy of Errors, Reader’s Digest, Canadian Edition, Dec. 2003, p. 76 (Originally published Dec.30, 2002 in MacLean’s)
In case you have trouble doing the addition of the numbers, that adds up to about 50,000 fatalities a year that are caused by the Canadian health care system. Obviously, the situation in the U.S. is very similar.If you are concerned, as eventually you too will be at risk (if you are not already), there is more about all of the here: “Neglected to Death”.
Posted in Health issues | Print | No Comments »
A note on hearing technology
September 11, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Do you have tinnitus or any hearing impairment? This is an interesting discussion on hearing aids and HA-related issues that you must read.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/10/a-note-about-hearing-technology/
About tinnitus (ringing in the ear), with which I am afflicted, in a reply to one of the comments that mentioned tinnitus, Anthony Watts points to a remedy that may help. I have not tried it yet, but I will, because my problem with tinnitus is gradually becoming worse. It has begun to impair my ability to hear well.
You may wish to check out the link identified by Anthony Watts, if for no other reason than to find out what tinnitus is, what causes it and to listen to what it sounds like. The “High Frequency Buzzing” sound track at that web page sounds exactly like the tinnitus that bothers me. Take a look at this: http://www.quietrelief.com/
“Tinnitus is common; about one in five people between 55 and 65 years old report symptoms on a general health questionnaire, and 11.8% on more detailed tinnitus-specific questionnaires.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinnitus
Posted in Health issues | Print | No Comments »
Some climate news
August 16, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
It was a cold month in hell for global-warming alarmists.
You don’t need a Weatherman to know which way the wind blows
canadafreepress.com
You don’t need a Weatherman to know which way the wind blows, Violent ideological Weathermen, an increasingly overwrought Weatherman teetering on the edge of insanity, and finally, we’ll meet a Weatherman paid to produce skewed meteorological results.
http://sppiblog.org/news/david
-suzuki-insults-but-won%E2%80% 99t-debate
Let them truckers roll down under, 10-4
wattsupwiththat.com
From The Australian, the beginning of a nationwide convoy protesting the carbon tax. I’m sure the delicate sensibilities of the ruling class in Canberra, most of which don’t know the meaning of act…
Sometimes the truth really is inconvenient.
www.forbes.com
There are, as you will have noticed, a number of different views around how we go about solving climate change. From those who think it’s all nonsense and my, hasn’t Al Gore got fat? to those who insist that only the immediate overthrow of capitalism, the return of medieval peasantry, […]
www.youtube.com
Deconstructing Anthropogenic Global Warming alarmism and the myth of ‘peer-review’. http://skepticdenialism.blogsp
ot.com/2011/06/peer-reviewed-d eception.html…
Posted in Climate Craziness, Weather, Climate Change | Print | No Comments »
Handbook for Seniors
August 10, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
I have had a few inquiries by Canadians in Alberta on how to contact elected representatives. Pointers to required contact details are as follows.
1.) To find federal politicians: http://www.parl.gc.ca/Default.aspx?Language=E
2.) To find provincial politicians in Alberta: http://www.assembly.ab.ca/net/index.aspx?p=mla_home
3.) Pointers that are useful for people living in Bruderheim and area:
Contact details for your MP, Leon Benoit:
Contacts details for your MLA, Ed Stelmach:
http://www.assembly.ab.ca/net/index.aspx?p=mla_conta ct&rnumber=55
http://www.leonbenoit.ca/media/20110113_Benoit_Seniors%20Handbook%20FINAL.PDF (PDF file, 4 MB)
Posted in Tips and Notes | Print | No Comments »
You think we have weather extremes?
July 26, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Weather extremes? You think we have weather extremes? Have a look at this:
A Chronological Listing of Early Weather Events
By James A. Masurek (2010)
The chronology covers weather events from the years 0 to 1900 A.D.
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/weather.pdf (9.4 MB)
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com
The following quotes from the chronology show just a few instances of warm weather when no one yet dreamed of “carbon” taxes, cap and trade or emission trading schemes to vacuum money out of our pockets:
582 A.D. In 582 in Western Europe, the heat of during the winter caused the trees to bloom in the month January. This month also was filled with violent rain, lightning and thunder.79 (Ibid. p. 20)
Winter of 583 / 584 A.D. The winter [in Europe] was of such persistent gentleness; that in the month of January one could see roses.62 (Ibid. p. 20)
In 584 the month of January in Western Europe produced roses. This was followed by a white frost, a hurricane and several disastrous incidents of hail that ravaged successive harvests of crops and vineyards. At the same time there was an excessive drought. The year produced almost no grapes. Desperate farmers delivered their vines at the mercy of the herds. But the trees, which had already borne fruit in July, producing a new crop in September, and some even bore again in December, and the vines offered at the same time well-formed clusters.79 (Ibid. p. 20)
586 A.D. [Because of the warm weather] in Western Europe the trees blossomed in the month of July 585 [586?], bloom again in September 586 and a large number of these who had already borne fruit produced a second crop of fruit until the Christmas holidays.79 (Ibid. p. 20)
However, just a few years later, this is what happened:
Winter of 603 / 604 A.D. In 604 in Scotland there was four months of frost, followed by dearth [famine]. The frost was also severe in England.47, 93
[In Europe] in 604, there was the most severe rigorous winter. The [grape] vines mostly died in all places. The Sea was frozen, and killed the fishes in it. This produced a great famine.72
The unusual cold of the year 603 in Western Europe killed much of the vineyards.79
(Ibid. p. 21)
Still, all of that was not so bad, compared to what happened just a few years later.
642 A.D. The winter in Europe was severe. The Black Sea was frozen. There were snowdrifts 90 feet (27 meters) deep.28 (Ibid. 22)
Still, things got worse:
Winter of 763 / 764 A.D. In the same year (763 A.D.), it was bitterly cold after the beginning of October, not only in our land, but even more so to the east, west, and north. Because of the cold, the north shore of the Black Sea froze to a depth of 30 cubits (~ 45 feet) a hundred miles out. This was so from Ninkhia to the Danube River, including the Kouphis, Dniester, and Dnieper Rivers, the Nekrophela, and the remaining promontories all the way to Mesembria and Medeia. Since the ice and snow kept on falling, its depth increased another twenty cubits (~ 30 feet), so that the sea became dry land. It was traveled by wild men and tame beasts from Khazaria, Bulgaria, and the lands of other adjacent people.
By divine command, during February of the same (764 A.D.) second indication the ice divided into a great number of mountainous chunks. The force of the wind brought them down to Daphnousia and Hieron, so that they came through the Bosporos to the city (Constantinople or Istanbul) and all the way to Propontis, Abydos, and the islands, filling every shore. We ourselves were an eyewitness and, with thirty companions, went out onto one of them and played on it. The icebergs had many dead animals, both wild and domestic, on them. Anyone who wanted to could travel unhindered on dry land from Sophianai to the city and from Chrysopolis to St. Mamas or Galata. One of these icebergs was dashed against the harbor of the acropolis, and shattered it. Another mammoth one smashed against the wall and badly shook it, so that the houses inside trembled along with it. It broke into three pieces, which girdled the city from Magnaura to the Bosporos, and was taller than the walls. All the city’s men, women, and children could not stop staring at the icebergs, then went back home lamenting and in tears, at a loss as to what to say about this phenomenon. (Theophanes the Confessor).3
Around Constantinople (now Istanbul, Turkey), the two seas frozen.47, 93
In the winter of 762 A.D., the Dardanelles and Black Sea were frozen over, and snow drifted to an astonishing depth of 50 feet (15 meters).1 [misprint for 763 A.D.] (Ibid. p. 25)
Do you think that those wide swings from one extreme to another, from extreme heat to extreme cold in the space of a few years and even months could have been caused by fluctuations in industrial emissions of CO2, by wide and catastrophic variations in the numbers of SUVs that were manufactured and sold?
Weather extremes have always happened and will continue to happen. The only thing that will ensure our survival is to be prepared for when they happen. To cripple our economy through insane and futile attempts to regulate the climate when we are not even close to understanding how our climate functions is exactly the wrong thing to do. That will ensure nothing more than that when the need to adapt to weather extremes arises, we will have made sure that we do not have the means necessary by which to adapt.
Lemmings come to mind, and this is what lemmings do:
700 A.D. In England and Ireland, there was a famine and pestilence during three years, “so that men ate each other”.57, 91
In 700, our Saxon ancestors being yet heathens were plagued with such severe famine for three years together, that many died of hunger. And in Sussex, England many were so tormented with it, that sometimes groups of 40 people would get up on the rocks by the seaside and throw themselves down headlong into the sea and were drowned.72 (Ibid. p. 24)
Posted in The New World Order, Propaganda debunked, Weather, Climate Change | Print | 2 Comments »
High costs bury AEP’s carbon burial plan
July 16, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
The king wears no clothing, but it is even worse that he can’t afford to pay for being made to look like a naked fool.
High Costs Bury AEP’s Carbon Burial Plan
Posted on July 15, 2011 by News StaffAmerican Electric Power has scuttled its pilot project to bury CO2 from its Mountaineer coal-burning plant in Red Haven WVa. The original projected cost, before unanticipated overruns, was $668 million. About 1/3 of the gross output from a plant would be required to capture, compress and inject the CO2 into the ground, generating an automatic 50% increase in the cost of net output, before conversion costs.
“The AEP plan, announced with much fanfare in 2009, marked the first time that carbon dioxide was to be captured and buried at a US power plant.”
The pilot system would only have captured 110,000 tons of CO2 per year, out of a total of 7.9 to 9.8 million tons per year from the plant. The company, headquartered in Columbus, “cited difficulties in getting state regulators to approve charging customers for the costs of carbon capture.”
From this morning’s Columbus (OH) Dispatch: http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/business/stories/2011/07/15/high-costs-bury-aeps-carbon-plan.html?sid=101
______________
It is a good thing that the people that made the decision to scuttle the AEP CCS project came to their senses. A country that is at the verge of bankruptcy should not waste one-third of a power plant’s energy production to bury even a fraction of the beneficial natural fertilizer that plant exhausts into the air, fertilizer that is essentially free of cost.
The economics of the decision to scuttle the CCS project are sound and make sense. It boggles the mind why anyone in their right mind and not blinded by harmful environmental fanaticism ever made a move to spend even a single dollar on such a hare-brained scheme.
The situation with Shell’s CSS project in Alberta is no different with respect to it being a hare-brained scheme by environmental fanatics and government agencies catering to them holding Shell over a barrel. Don’t blame Shell for the idea that blowing CO2 down Mother Earth’s derriere at a billion-dollars a shot is a thing that Alberta consumers must fund. It is a political decision which Shell supports only because it cannot lose on it on account of taxpayers and consumers footing the bill.
I you think that those observations are not substantiated by facts, then you better have a look at the comments that were posted at wattsupwiththat.com in relation to the AEP CSS scheme.
Posted in Climate Craziness, The New World Order, Shell CCS Project, Corruption & Fraud, Community & Industry, Electric Energy Prices, Emission Incidents & Issues | Print | No Comments »
Energy & Environmental News - 6/6/11
June 13, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Some recent energy articles of interest
By John Droz, Jr.
An interesting article appeared in a wind industry trade journal: “Is Wind Energy The New Wedge Issue For Conservatives?”
( http://www.nawindpower.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.7757 ).
Some of the comments are: “The acrimony is being powered by a combination of small-government conservatives who see wind and other renewables as a waste of money and by others who consider wind a technology that will never be as effective as oil, coal or natural gas.” In other words people are objecting to wind energy as it is expensive and ineffective. Imagine that!
And there is this from the comptroller of Texas (a very pro-wind state): “wind is an expensive boondoggle that does not produce jobs”.
Note that the industry does not respond with proof that these positions are wrong, but rather tries to dismiss them as being political…
—————————–
A wonderful assessment of wind energy by an energy expert http://ansnuclearcafe.org/2011/05/26/fitting-wind-onto-the-electricity-grid-part-2/ .
A VERY promising development where New Jersey is dropping out of the RGGI program http://www.atinstitute.org/ati-statement-on-gov-chris-christies-plans-to-remove-new-jersey-from-rggi/ . Hopefully this will be a wake-up call to the other member states.
Renewables Laws Changing is a positive development compared to the prior RPS mandates
http://www.renewablesbiz.com/article/11/05/renewables-laws-changing .
Some good comments by the governor of Maine about a more sensible position on renewables
http://waldo.villagesoup.com/column/columnpost/weekly-radio-address/400386 .
A new MIT study has some unique perspectives on the economics of wind energy http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/6317 .
“Oil ‘subsidy’ and ‘tax breaks’ nonsense” gives a superior overview to this contentious issue:
http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9598/pub_detail.asp
“The Politics of Alternative Energy 1: The Myth of Viable Industrial-scale Renewable Energy”:
“‘Success is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm.’ Winston Churchill’s dictum could have been coined for the green advocates of the renewable energy revolution; a revolution that demonstrates a thorough-going disconnect between the political rhetoric and a grasp of the physics and economics vital to energy realism.” http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/7616/The-Politics-of-Alternative-Energy-1–The-Myth-of-Viable-Industrial-scale-Renewable-Energy
“Inconvenient Truths about Renewable Energy”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703421204576327410322365714.html?KEYWORDS=energy#printMode .
Another Real Estate professional speaks out saying that wind projects can bring down home values 25 to 40 percent — for as much as 2 miles away: http://www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca/news_item.php?NewsID=35521 .
In a fascinating development a Spanish judge orders a wind project to be dismantled
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/18/wind-farm-ordered-dismantled/ .
“NY Wind: Much Ado About So Little” http://www.windaction.org/faqs/31912 .
One of the key facts to focus on is that there is no such thing as wind energy by itself. This article makes that very point
http://canadianenergyissues.com/2010/12/11/wind-power-is-gas-power-and-comes-with-pollution/ .
The Australian government is revisiting the wind acoustic issue. The good news is that some of the presenters at their discussion are actually qualified scientists who contend that there are serious human consequences to wind development. See http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/news/2011/june-6-2011-645-pm-ny-city-time/ .
Green Energy costs 1500 jobs http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/247946/EU-push-for-green-energy-costs-another-1-500-jobs .
Why do we need to choose between nuclear and renewables — we don’t:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/may/27/why-choose-nuclear-renewable-energy .
“Everything you’ve heard about fossil fuels may be wrong” talks extensively about wind energy
http://www.salon.com/news/env/energy/?story=/politics/war_room/2011/05/31/linbd_fossil_fuels .
A good letter about Yucca mountain and the US economic benefits of nuclear energy http://tinyurl.com/3pcmyrk .
Some recent global warming articles of interest —
“Former ‘alarmist’ scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) based in false science”
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/15/former-alarmist-scientist-says-anthropogenic-global-warming-agw-based-on-false-science/ .
“Germany’s green government advisors admit frankly that decarbonization can only be achieved by the limitation of democracy - both nationally and internationally.” http://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article13396336/Wir-rutschen-Hals-ueber-Kopf-in-die-Oekodiktatur.html .
A fine discussion of Patrick Moore and the religion of environmentalism
http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2011/5/the-personal-costs-of-spurning-green-misanthropy .
“The Global Warming Doctrine is Not a Science” (Vaclav Klaus): http://www.klaus.cz/clanky/2830 .
Thank you for your support.
john droz jr.,
physicist & environmental advocate
Posted in Electric Energy Prices, The New World Order, Energy Newsletter, Energy Issues, Alternative Energy Sources, Fines & Penalties, Climate Change, Community & Industry | Print | No Comments »
Energy & Environmental News-5/17/11
May 20, 2011 by Walter Schneider.
Some recent energy articles of interest
By John Droz, Jr.
In a shockingly honest assessment, the head of the NYS agency promoting offshore wind, now publicly admits that it’s a bad idea:
A fine list that dispels the myths about the “anti-wind” campaign http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/print-friendly/33662
An extremely pertinent report is this worldwide study comparing energy use to several other important matters (e.g. infant mortality rate, GDP, literacy rate, etc.) http://www.aeaiinc.com/reports/Energy_and_Country_Instability.pdf
A Spanish community voted to pass a “visual impact” tax on wind turbines (1.6% of their generated income) http://www.windpowermonthly.com/News/MostRead/1061498/Spanish-region-imposes-visual-impact-tax-turbines/
Wind Power’s Promises Gone Awry, written by a NY physicist http://www.empirepage.com/2011/4/26/promises-and-predictions-gone-awry
A new book “The False Promise of Green Energy” http://www.cato.org/store/books/false-promise-green-energy
Obama on Energy: Inconsistent, Incoherent http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/7290/Obama-on-Energy-Inconsistent-Incoherent
Very promising news: government financial support of Cape Wind project now in doubt
http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110513/NEWS11/110519876
The official UK’s government’s climate advisory panel (made up mostly of environmental activists) recently concluded that building nuclear was the way to go: http://tinyurl.com/3s6ydep
A reasonable discussion of nuclear radiation, written by an environmentalist
http://www.marklynas.org/2011/03/the-dangers-of-nuclear-power-in-light-of-fukushima/
A good article, with graphics, about Small Modular Reactors http://www.climatecentral.org/blogs/small-modular-reactors-smaller-and-cheaper/.
Other worthwhile discussions of the same topic
- http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/03/the-new-debate-fukushima-and-small-modular-nuclear-reactors/73084/
- http://alfin2300.blogspot.com/2011/04/can-small-modular-nuclear-reactors-save.html
- http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/The-Future-of-Nuclear-Energy-Small-Modular-Nuclear-Reactors.html
“Lots of Dirty Things Have To Happen to Make Clean Energy” touches on some of the environmental downsides of wind energy
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/05/ron-arnold-lots-dirty-things-have-happen-make-clean-energy
Some recent global warming articles of interest
George Manbiot is one of the leading environmentalists on the planet. Recently he wrote two introspective columns about the environmental movement, and how it has gone wrong. For an environmentalist, he makes some amazingly candid observations:
part 1 http://www.monbiot.com/2011/05/02/the-lost-world/
part 2 http://www.monbiot.com/2011/05/05/our-crushing-dilemmas/
In my view, the main failing of his commentaries is that he doesn’t see the solution. It’s this:
Any and all environmental solutions must be truly SCIENCE-based. To date they have instead been POLITICAL agendas. If the environmental movement adopted real science (not things like consensus science) then environmental progress would happen.
A fine article about AGW and the Scientific Method http://www.quadrant.org.au/blogs/doomed-planet/2011/04/scientific-method
All you need to know about AGW http://www.theblogofrecord.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/global-warming-cartoon-the-rent-seekers-dream-come-true1.jpg
“The Ten Major Failures of Consensus Science” http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/10_major_consensus_failures.pdf
A new good website about the fallacy of AGW http://www.galileomovement.com.au
Thank you for your support.
john droz jr.,
physicist & environmental advocate
Posted in Energy Newsletter, Propaganda debunked, Energy Issues, Alternative Energy Sources, Climate Change | Print | No Comments »
