You are currently browsing the archives for the Energy Purchases category.
- Acid Rain (13)
- Alternative Energy Sources (10)
- Bruderheim Seniors (1)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Climate Change (102)
- Community & Industry (65)
- Derailments (2)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (110)
- Energy Issues (7)
- Energy Purchases (3)
- Explosions & Fires (20)
- Fines & Penalties (13)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (13)
- Organizational News (1)
- Pollution: Health Issues (41)
- Sulphur Logistics (37)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (66)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (26)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Weather (7)
- World Sulphur Glut (19)
- March 10, 2010: Climate Astrology
- March 9, 2010: "Dirty Oil" -- Duck Images
- March 6, 2010: Alarmism vs. objective science
- March 6, 2010: Global-warming conference coming up
- March 4, 2010: Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
- February 21, 2010: John Coleman’s Global Warming Special #2
- February 8, 2010: "Green-Police" commercial gone ape
- January 31, 2010: Professor Ian Plimer on climate change
- January 31, 2010: Global Warming: the Collapse of a Grand Narrative
- January 30, 2010: CO2-warming is as impossible as is perpetual motion
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for the Energy Purchases Category
Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
March 4, 2010 by admin.
August Review
The Global Elite Research Letter
Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
By Patrick Wood, Editor
March 2, 2010
Introduction
According to the United Nations Governing Council of the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP), “our dominant economic model may thus be termed a ‘brown economy.” UNEP’s clearly stated goal is to overturn the “brown economy” and replace it with a “green economy”:
“A green economy implies the decoupling of resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth… These investments, both public and private, provide the mechanism for the reconfiguration of businesses, infrastructure and institutions, and for the adoption of sustainable consumption and production processes.” [p. 2]
Sustainable consumption? Reconfiguring businesses, infrastructure and institutions? What do these words mean? They do not mean merely reshuffling the existing order, but rather replacing it with a completely new economic system, one that has never before been seen or used in the history of the world.
This paper will demonstrate that the current crisis of capitalism is being used to implement a radical new economic system that will completely supplant it. This is not some new idea created in the bowels of the United Nations: It is a revitalized implementation of Technocracy that was thoroughly repudiated by the American public in 1933, in the middle of the Great Depression….(Full Story)
Posted in Energy Issues, Community & Industry, Energy Purchases | Print | No Comments »
Group ready to fight proposed sulphur plant
April 13, 2009 by admin.
The Edmonton Journal
Edmonton,Alberta,Canada
April 13, 2009
Bruderheim families voice safety concerns over ‘dangerous’ plan
By Andrea Sands,
…Area homeowners are also worried that train cars carrying sulphur to and from the plant may derail. Debbie Bishop, a lawyer for FOLC, said residents don’t … (Full Story)
________________
Note by folc.ca: The article identified above discusses the concerns of FOLC (Friends of Lamont County) that county residents in the vicinity of a proposed sulphur-forming, -storage and -shipping facility to be built less than two miles east of the Town have, if the Natural Resource Conservation Board (NRCB) gives HAZCO permission to build the sulphur plant and storage facility at the intended location.
The sulphur storage will have a capacity of up to 90,000 tonnes. That is the carrying capacity of approximately six sulphur unit-trains of a hundred cars each and six times the amount of sulphur that burned in the disastrous sulphur fire that harmed thousands of residents at the town of Macassar, South Africa, in 1995. Macassar was located at a somewhat greater distance from that sulphur fire than Bruderheim is located in relation to the proposedHAZCO sulphur plant.
The NRCB hearing will be held during an estimated four-day interval at the Lakeview Inn & Suites, 10115 - 88 Ave, Fort Saskatchewan. The hearing will begin at 9:00 a.m., April 14, 2009.
The NRCB hearing is crucial to the future of the people who live in Lamont County. What is at stake is essentially whether Lamont County — at the very least the areas that have been rezoned Heavy Industrial, and the areas adjacent to them — will within the space of a few years become as devoid of residences as is the Industrial Heartland in Strathcona County.
HAZCO’s sulphur facility poses a threat to residents within a large radius from its location (including the residents of Bruderheim and Lamont). That is what is at stake at the NRCB hearing beginning on Tuesday.
It is in the best interest of every single resident of our county to attend. It is especially in the interest of the residents of Bruderheim and Lamont to attend.
A good number of concerns by Lamont-County residents have not yet been addressed satisfactorily. It is our health, our lives and our wellbeing that is at stake.
Make sure you are there!
Lakeview Inn & Suites
10115 - 88 Ave, Fort Saskatchewan,
April 14, 2009, 9:00 a.m.
The details of the concerns by FOLC can be looked up at this link.
More information about sulphur fires is accessible at folc.ca.
Posted in Energy Purchases, Fines & Penalties, Hazco, Sulphur-Related Construction Costs, Hydrogen-Sulphide, Uncategorized | Print | No Comments »
Energy purchase contracts are in great demand
November 25, 2006 by admin.
That is not sulphur-related news. Nevertheless, it is of interest to people who live in rural areas in the vicinity of the waste-sulphur facility proposed by HAZCO.Application forms for energy-purchase contracts for members of the Bruderheim and Chipman REAs can be obtained now. The contracts offer electric energy at a price that is about two cents per kWh below the price those members are paying presently for energy offered under the regulated rate tariff. The regulated rate tariff has been increasing every month lately, while the contract price on offer will be guaranteed to stay for one year at the rate of 6.9 cents per kWh. That is a clear and substantial advantage and explains why the application forms for energy purchase contracts are in such great demand. (Additional Details)
Posted in Energy Purchases | Print | No Comments »