You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day January 17, 2012.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for January 17, 2012
Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
January 17, 2012 by Walter Schneider.
Today is is fairly cold but not extremely cold in Alberta. Around Fort McMurray it was about -44°C this morning, and here in Bruderheim it was -30.9°C.
Presently, at 4:00 p.m., it warmed up a bit in Bruderheim to -27.9°C.
That is cold, but those temperatures are not record-cold temperatures. Still, on account of the cold weather, of which we have had fairly little this winter, the Alberta electric power industry experienced record-high consumption rates yesterday and appealed through the media to the public, especially to residential consumers, to limit their electricity consumption by not using major appliances during the peak hours of the day (during noon and supper hours).
Roughly 15 percent of electric power consumed in Alberta is being used by residential consumers. It was not explained why the inconvenience of saving on electric energy use was placed on residential consumers and whether industrial and commercial consumers are expected to follow suit. It is a nice thought to press the urgency of the situation home with residential consumers, to prepare them for what will quite possibly follow soon, another rate hike for residential consumers.
There would be no shortage of electric power generation in Alberta if all of the money spend on installing wind-power generation, that without fail fails to put out on cold days, would have been used instead to construct power generating capacity from conventional energy sources, either coal, or, perhaps better yet, from the surplus of natural gas with which we are blessed. That was not done, and we now have to pay for wind-power generation that is not available when it is needed and, to boot, costs many times per unit of production what power generation construction and production from conventional fuel sources cost.
Have a look at the table “Generation”, at this link: http://ets.aeso.ca/ets_web/ip/Market/Reports/CSDReportServlet
The following table has been created from the data shown there for 2012 01 17 4:30 p.m.. Columns have been inserted to identify the percentage for each group of the energy total shown shown in the bottom line for each category.
MC = rated maximum generation (Maximum Capacity)
TNG = actual generation (Total Net Generation)
DCR = Dispatched (and Accepted) Contingency Reserve
Note that of the total wind-power maximum generating capacity that can be produced under ideal conditions (865MW), at the time when it is needed most only 2.2 percent or 18MW are being generated. That will happen every time when it gets very cold in Alberta, because then the wind doesn’t blow.
It adds insult to injury that when that little bit of wind energy, in this case 0.2 percent of the total energy produced in Alberta, gets fed into the transmission grid, it is by far and many times more expensive than what the price of electric energy usually is.
Usually energy that is being fed into the transmission grid will cost about $23.00 per MWh, but the wind power that is being fed into the grid when it is needed during very cold weather costs around $1,000 per MWh or $1.00 per kWh. That is the cost that everyone else involved in the industry will escalate by adding their costs for transmission, distribution and distribution services. The end consumers will have to pay for all of it but will not notice much of that, because the price to them will be averaged out, but it will still be paid by them.
Even under the best of circumstances Alberta’s wind turbines only feed about one-third of the energy they are theoretically capable of producing into the transmission grid. When the wind blows too strong, wind turbines are shut off (they are supposed to do that automatically) to prevent having tear themselves to shreds.
Posted in Electric Energy Prices, Energy Issues, Weather, Alternative Energy Sources | Print | No Comments »
