You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day May 5, 2010.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for May 5, 2010
Climate forecasts are wrong
May 5, 2010 by Walter Schneider.
Climate forecasts are wrong because they violate forecasting principles.
Public Policy Forecasting
Special Interest Group
Comments on the United States Department of State’s U.S. Climate Action Report 2010, 5th ed.
May 4, 2010
Scott Armstrong, Kesten Green, and Willie Soon made a submission titled “Global Warming Alarm Based on Faulty Forecasting Procedures” on the State Department’s report:
Our research findings challenge the basic assumptions of the State Department’s Fifth U.S. Climate Action Report (CAR 2010). The alarming forecasts of dangerous manmade global warming are not the product of proper scientific evidence-based forecasting methods. Furthermore, there have been no validation studies to support a belief that the forecasting procedures used were nevertheless appropriate for the situation. As a consequence, alarming forecasts of global warming are merely the opinions of some scientists and, for a situation as complicated and poorly understood as global climate, such opinions are unlikely to be as accurate as forecasts that global temperatures will remain much the same as they have been over recent years. Using proper forecasting procedures we predict that the global warming alarm will prove false and that government actions in response to the alarm will be shown to have been harmful.
Whether climate will change over the 21st Century, by how much, in what direction, to what effect, and what if anything people could and should do about any changes are all forecasting problems. Given that policy makers currently do not have access to scientific forecasts for any of these, the policies that have been proposed with the avowed purpose of reducing dangerous manmade global warming—such as are described in CAR 2010 Chapters 4, 5, 6, and 7—are likely to cause serious and unnecessary harm.
In this comment on CAR 2010, we summarize findings from our research on forecasting climate. Most of our findings have been published in the peer-reviewed literature and all have been presented at scientific meetings. They are easily accessible on the Internet and we provide links to them. (Source)
A copy of their submission is available here.
Posted in Climate Change | Print | No Comments »
The fortunes of cap-and-trade
May 5, 2010 by Walter Schneider.
The Cypress Times
BARACK OBAMA, AL GORE, GOLDMAN SACHS, AND THE GREATEST SWINDLE IN HUMAN HISTORY
By Gary P.
Published 05/04/2010 - 12:04 p.m. CST
“It is the Responsibility of the Patriot to protect his country from its government” ~Thomas Paine
$10,000,000,000,000
Ten trillion dollars. That’s the conservative estimate of the amount of money Barack Obama, Albert Gore Jr., and a whole cast of criminals stand to make yearly (gross) off of the greatest scam in human history: “global warming.”…(Full Story)
_____________
It is an amazing summary of the creation of cap-and-trade, and, of course, Maurice Strong is one of the key players involved in it all along.
The story covers the business angle of it and some of what it will cost us normal mortals. There is a related story that just came to light in connection with the publishing of a book, Climate: The Counter Consensus, by Professor Robert Carter, a renowned paleoclimatologist.
Professor Robert Carter was interviewed in relation to the issues addressed in Climate: The Counter Consensus. Prof. Carter explained that, with respect to the concern with climate change, there are three separate climate change realities:
- The scientific reality, the scientific observations of the aspects of climate change, aspects that show man-made impacts are minuscule and so insignificant that they cannot be measured;
- The virtual reality, projections based on computer modelling, projections whose validity cannot be tested scientifically and that have no to a vanishingly-small chance of being correct, too small for anyone to have to worry about them; and
- The socio-political reality, a reality that politicians and bureaucrats must deal with, a reality of their own creation that got the general public needlessly worked up into being alarmed and worried about climate change, whereby the public now expects and clamors that the politicians do something to save them from the dangers posed by the imaginary calamities of climate change, so as to take actions that will save the world from climate change, actions that will not be necessary and will have no effect at all.
The full story on that is accessible here. Don’t neglect to look up the video of the interview. (More information on and by Dr. Carter)
The first story, above, the one about the fraud and corruption of the fortunes of cap-and-trade, falls into the realm of the third reality listed above.
Posted in Corruption & Fraud, Climate Change | Print | 3 Comments »