Thanks to [1] climaterealists.com

EDITORIAL: [2] Global warming’s unscientific method, Washington Times
Thursday, April 8th 2010, 5:41 AM EDT

Science is undermined by scaremongers’ abuse of peer-review process

The prophets of global warming continue to lament as their carefully crafted yarn unravels before their eyes. Ross McKitrick, an intrepid economics professor from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, has tugged apart the thin mathematical threads that once held together the story of climate change. ([3] Full Story)

___________
The reference article summarizes Dr. Ross McKitrick’s long-standing attempts to get a discussion paper published that refuted the IPCC’s false assertion that alleged rising temperature trends in the latter half of the 20th Century are not contaminated by urban-heat-island effects.

Here is a link to Dr. Ross McKitrick’s full account of the history and context of his attempts to get his discussion paper published.

[4] Circling the Bandwagons: My Adventures Correcting the IPCC
By Ross McKitrick

From reading that account, it is quite obvious that “peer review” of discussion papers in climate research is nothing of the sort but much rather a process of deliberate censorship of inconvenient truths.