You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day February 8, 2010.
- Acid Rain (13)
- Alternative Energy Sources (10)
- Bruderheim Seniors (1)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Climate Change (104)
- Community & Industry (65)
- Derailments (2)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (110)
- Energy Issues (7)
- Energy Purchases (3)
- Explosions & Fires (20)
- Fines & Penalties (13)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (13)
- Organizational News (1)
- Pollution: Health Issues (41)
- Sulphur Logistics (37)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (66)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (26)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Weather (7)
- World Sulphur Glut (19)
- March 12, 2010: The forging of climate temperature data
- March 11, 2010: Global-warming data manufactured
- March 10, 2010: Climate Astrology
- March 9, 2010: "Dirty Oil" -- Duck Images
- March 6, 2010: Alarmism vs. objective science
- March 6, 2010: Global-warming conference coming up
- March 4, 2010: Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
- February 21, 2010: John Coleman’s Global Warming Special #2
- February 8, 2010: "Green-Police" commercial gone ape
- January 31, 2010: Professor Ian Plimer on climate change
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for February 8, 2010
“Green-Police” commercial gone ape
February 8, 2010 by admin.
The daily inundation through commercials and other advertisements in the media includes initiatives by policy makers as well as opportunistic consequences of policies. It is at times difficult to tell whether climate hype and hysteria feed on “commercial” insanity or whether the insane hysteria about climate change presented by policy makers is what drives the business interests who inflict insane commercials on the population.
Having grown up in and during Hitler’s regime, there is one thing I know, because I observed it first hand. Hitler said in “Mein Kampf” that the implementation of absolute ideological domination depends on the extent to which a simplified propaganda message — tailored to the lowest common denominator of the capabilities of the most simplistic elements in the masses — saturizes the daily lives of the masses continuously and all pervasively.
Thanks to wattsupwiththat.com, here is a link to a prime example of the blurring of the line between intent and consequences of high-intensity propaganda:
The Superbowl “Green Police” commercial
That is “truth” in advertising? The truth shall set you free, but keep in mind that, when propaganda was only an art and not yet a science, Hitler said:
The function of propaganda is, for example, not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly. (More)
—Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter VI
It does not pay to buy in on artistic or “scientific” over-the-top propaganda efforts. It makes no difference whether they are used to promote totalitarian politics or intensified consumerism.
Posted in Climate Change | Print | No Comments »