You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day November 20, 2009.
- Acid Rain (13)
- Alternative Energy Sources (10)
- Bruderheim Seniors (1)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Climate Change (102)
- Community & Industry (65)
- Derailments (2)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (110)
- Energy Issues (7)
- Energy Purchases (3)
- Explosions & Fires (20)
- Fines & Penalties (13)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (13)
- Organizational News (1)
- Pollution: Health Issues (41)
- Sulphur Logistics (37)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (66)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (26)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Weather (7)
- World Sulphur Glut (19)
- March 10, 2010: Climate Astrology
- March 9, 2010: "Dirty Oil" -- Duck Images
- March 6, 2010: Alarmism vs. objective science
- March 6, 2010: Global-warming conference coming up
- March 4, 2010: Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
- February 21, 2010: John Coleman’s Global Warming Special #2
- February 8, 2010: "Green-Police" commercial gone ape
- January 31, 2010: Professor Ian Plimer on climate change
- January 31, 2010: Global Warming: the Collapse of a Grand Narrative
- January 30, 2010: CO2-warming is as impossible as is perpetual motion
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for November 20, 2009
UN’s climate-alarmism fraud exposed!
November 20, 2009 by admin.
Thanks to Luboš Motl, physicist, Pilsen, Czech Republic:
The Hadley climate center has been hacked [*] or reviewed by a whistleblower who could no longer stand the dirt, and the files have been freely posted. If you want to download an interesting 62-megabyte file, which unpacks to 156 megabytes or so, here are some links.
Just in time for the upcoming UN climate conference in Copenhagen, exposing the UN climate fraud permits insights into what is behind the pandemic of the UN-promoted climate alarmism: a sleezy mix of tax-fraud, data manipulation, scientific fraud, ad-hominem attacks on reputable climate scientists who dare to oppose the climate-propaganda agenda, and much more.
Tell your kids when you put them to bed at night that they should not worry about Earth going up in flames, that what little global warming there is is quite natural and even good for the environment, that the Earth is actually cooling right now and has done so for a good number of years, and that there is no evidence that shows that there is any man-made global warming. Tell them that the same people who promoted the global-warming fears all along are the ones that amongst themselves discuss how to best put the big lie across.
However, read Luboš Motl’s take on the embarrassing exposure of the leading climate scientists who drive the climate-propaganda war.
Update 2009 11 21: Here is a link to a searchable web page containing the e-mail files of concern: Alleged CRU Emails - Searchable
The title of the web page contains the word “alleged”, but there is little doubt in my mind that all of the e-mail messages are quoted accurately. I read quite a few of the messages. Many are messages I had read over the past few years. Given that those messages were quoted accurately, it is extremely unlikely that anyone would have been able to fake the context and contents of the e-mail messages that ensued in reactions by the CRU-related participants who participated in the collusion to tweak and manipulate the climate data manufactured such as to produce the very questionable claims necessary to promote the UN’s IPCC climate scam.
____________
* According to a news story published by CBS and others,
It’s not clear how the files were leaked. One theory says that a malicious hacker slipped into East Anglia’s network and snatched thousands of documents. Another says that the files had already been assembled in response to a Freedom of Information request and, immediately after it was denied, a whistleblower decided to disclose them. (Lending credence to that theory is the fact that no personal e-mail messages unrelated to climate change appear to have been leaked.) (Source Link)
Posted in Climate Change | Print | No Comments »