- Lamont County Environment - http://lce.folc.ca -
Zama City - Sulphur fire and evacuation
Posted By Walter Schneider On October 31, 2008 @ 10:08 am In Community & Industry, Explosions & Fires, Emission Incidents & Issues, Hazco, Sulphur-Dioxide | No Comments
Zamma [sic] City evacuated
By KEVIN CRUSH, Sun Media
2008 08 15
Zama City had to be evacuated after a fire at a sulphur plant Friday.
Fire broke out in a front end loader at the Apache Gas plant about 20 km south of the town at 1 p.m.
The loader was on top of a sulphur block at the time and when crews tried to get it off the block itself caught on fire.
The burning block produced hydrogen sulfide gas, which is deadly if inhaled, and sulfur dioxide which is also harmful….([1] Full Story)
________________
Note by folc.ca: There was a correction by officials, namely that the gas of concern was not hydrogen sulphide but that only sulphur dioxide (a product of the combustion of sulphur) was involved.
It seems that another item of information in the story requires correction. That is that the location of the sulphur-block that was on fire appears to be about exactly 15 km south-west of Zama City.
The evacuation of the residents of Zama City is of great interest to residents in Lamont County, especially to those in the vicinity of the proposed sulphur-forming facility intended to be constructed south-east of the intersection of Highway 45 and Range Road 202, 1.5 miles from the eastern border of the town of Bruderheim and 3.5 miles from the western border of the Town of Lamont.
Sulphur fires do happen. [2] As shown in the webpages at folc.ca, they happen fairly often, and they can be and are started by front-end loaders used to handle sulphur.
AlthoughFront-end loaders feature prominently in HAZCO’s plans for their proposed sulphur-forming and shipping facility east of Bruderheim. [3] Evacuations of residents in the vicinity of sulphur fires are a fact of life. As per the article identified above, Mackenzie County Reeve Greg Newman stated, “With the limited access in and out of there and the potential for a major fire on the sulphur block, there was some concern,” and “I’d like to think we’re prepared for just about everything. We expect these kinds of things and we have the resources to prepare for them.”
That is in stark contrast to comparable expectations and the availability of resources to prepare for them in Lamont County. HAZCO were repeatedly asked for details of evacuation plans in case of sulphur fires at their proposed plant. Other than to initially refusing to admit that sulphur fires at their sulphur facility could even happen or now claiming that it is [4] extremely unlikely that they would ever pose a danger to nearby residents, as of now we have not seen any plans by HAZCO as to what will be done to evacuate and temporarily house the thousands of residents in the vicinity that would be put at risk through fires at their proposed sulphur facility.
Article printed from Lamont County Environment: http://lce.folc.ca
URL to article: http://lce.folc.ca/2008/10/31/zama-city-sulphur-fire-and-evacuation/
URLs in this post:
[1] Full Story: http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Edmonton/2008/08/15/6467931.html
[2] As shown in the webpages at folc.ca, they happen fairly often: http://folc.ca/index.html#Sulphur_Fires
[3] Evacuations of residents in the vicinity of sulphur fires are a fact of life: http://folc.ca/sulphur_storage/evacuations.htm
[4] extremely unlikely that they would ever pose a danger to nearby residents: http://lce.folc.cafile:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/My%20Documents/My%20Web%
20Sites/folc/sulphur_storage/HAZCOs_FAQ_25.htm
Click here to print.