You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day October 27, 2008.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for October 27, 2008
Alter NRG’s Bruderheim IGCC power facility put on back-burner
October 27, 2008 by Walter Schneider.
Seeking Alpha
Alter NRG Changes Course to Build Up Cash Flow
by: FP Trading Desk October 22, 2008 | about stocks: ANRGF.PK
FP Trading Desk
In a new strategy to weather the financial credit crisis and build up its cash flow, Alter NRG Corp. (ANRGF.PK) is changing course, putting on the back burner two of the company’s main engineering and construction projects, the Bruderheim IGCC power and Fox Creek coal-to-liquid facilities.
Fraser Mackenzie Ltd. analyst John Safrance wrote in a research note:
….Trading as high as C$6.75 in May of this year, Alter NRG shares have been decimated in the global sell off over the past few months. So much so that after losing another C$0.10 in trading Wednesday morning, the stock now valued at C$0.90 is trading below Mr. Safrance’s estimated cash value for the company of approximately C$56-million or C$1 per share….(Full Story)
________
It seems that the possibility of receiving government grant money for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is a major motivator for the construction of Alter NRG’s Bruderheim power plant. However, it appears that the Alberta Government’s generositywill be stressed somewhat on account of the current market price of crude oil (in the order of $70) falling seriously short of projections that were based on estimates of an anticipated price of $115 per barrel.
CCS for the Alter NRG Bruderheim power plant is a bit of a red herring. CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor is it proven to be the cause of global warming. The major pollutant that would be produced by the Bruderheim power plant is a massive amount of water vapour that, with the prevalence of common temperature inversions layering during the winter, would quite likely produce massively dense fogs in the Bruderheim area, fogs that are now often already so dense that they frequently make driving extremely hazardous.
In the absence of government grants for CCS, the viability of the sales of electric energy to be produced by Alter NRG, given that initially it would depend on relatively expensive and rapidly depleting natural gas, is somewhat at risk in an energy market that will quite possibly see shrinking demand due to the escalating financial world crisis.
Posted in Town of Bruderheim, Community & Industry | Print | No Comments »