You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day July 22, 2008.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for July 22, 2008
Run-off-water problems at the proposed location for the Sage housing development
July 22, 2008 by Walter Schneider.
Letter to Dave Dubauskas, Chief Administration Officer of the Town of Bruderheim
2008 07 22
Hello Dave,
The proposed location for the Sage housing development, the 135 acres north of the Walker School, sure is a wet place, a flood plain and bad place for the construction of a residential subdivision intended to house 1,300 people. Topographically, the proposed area is at the lowest elevation in Bruderheim. It is a swampy flood plain that has become seriously inundated with run-off water on at least three separate occasions during the 35-year interval that I lived in this area. The watershed area draining into that flood plain is at least 30 square miles in size.
Quoted from the article at the following link The Proposed Sage Housing Development in Bruderheim (Published 2008 07 20):
It can only be hoped that our town council does not become blinded by short-term gain to ignore long-term pain. Doug Maschmeyer knows how to prevent from becoming ensnared by the Sage development. In leaving the information session, he said: “You won’t sell me a piece of property in that development!”
Let’s assume that the development will go through and that one of those floods that happen on average every dozen years or so in that area comes about. It will be an easy job even for a junior lawyer to sue the pants of the Town of Bruderheim. There is no way that such a flood could be called an act of God. All of the massive damages that would be caused by such a flood would be due to neglecting to use proper care and attention….
…it would be far more practical and a lot cheaper for contractors, home owners and opportunistic developers alike to build homes on land that doesn’t flood as often as does the area for the proposed Sage subdivision. Last but not least, that would also be far safer, financially, in regard to the risk the Town of Bruderheim would expose itself to if it were to issue permits for the construction of a residential subdivision on a flood plain that is quite literally the low point of the topography of Bruderheim.
Dave, please be so good and forward this message to Jack Lambert. It appears that the e-mail address I have for him no longer functions.
All the best,
–Walter Schneider
P.S.: By the way, check http://bruderheim.ca/FAQ.htm. Some of the information contained in that web page is inaccurate (e. g.: the composition of the Town Council is wrong). –WHS
Cc: Various members of the public, media and town council
Posted in Town of Bruderheim, Community & Industry | Print | 1 Comment »