You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day November 2, 2007.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (10)
- Alternative Energy Sources (16)
- Bruderheim Seniors (3)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (2)
- Climate Change (136)
- Community & Industry (76)
- Corruption & Fraud (9)
- Deficits and Debts (1)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (1)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (122)
- Energy Issues (10)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (24)
- Fines & Penalties (15)
- Gardening (1)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (2)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (14)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (45)
- Propaganda debunked (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (5)
- Town of Bruderheim (14)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (12)
- Wildlife (3)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- September 3, 2010: The IPCC and its relationship to the truth and objective science
- September 3, 2010: Vancouver: Sulphur fire sparks evacuation warning
- August 31, 2010: IPCC Climate "Science" -- Damaged Trust
- August 30, 2010: Bruderheim Seniors: Calendar of up-coming Events
- August 27, 2010: Soon to come to your neighbourhood tire store
- August 25, 2010: Pipeline expansion from Fort McMurray
- August 25, 2010: UK baby boom blamed on cold winter
- August 23, 2010: Canada's weather-service programs need repair
- August 23, 2010: Memoirs of a Disgusting Old Goat
- August 19, 2010: Leading US Physicist Labels Satellitegate Scandal a ‘Catastrophe’
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for November 2, 2007
Huge Fine Handed to Calgary Sulphur Processor
November 2, 2007 by Walter Schneider.
[for a substantial SO2 release caused by “an unexpected chemical reaction”]
Calgary Company Handed Huge Fine
2007 11 01
CALGARY/AM770CHQR - A Calgary company has been fined $280,000 after sulphur dioxide was released from their plant in the Foothills Industrial Park in January 2005.
A huge conti[n]gency of city emergency workers responded, and several of them reported adverse health effects because of the exposure.
Tiger Industries Limited pleaded guilty to one charge under the Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act.
The facility has since been sold and the company has until February 2008 to pay the fine. (Link to Story)
The Edmonton Journal carried a related story (2007 11 02; p. B10) that identified that the incident caused a large response by emergency crews, that a two-block area had been closed for most of the day, that a police officer had been taken to hospital with minor respiratory problems, and that several emergency workers Tiger employees complained of adverse health effects.
Interestingly, the Journal story, too, called the problem a sulphur-dioxide release, but it identified the cause of that as “an unexpected chemical reaction during a production run of a fertilizer blend.”
Tiger Industries Ltd. (a.k.a. Tigersul) in Calgary formed sulphur into prills or pellets for adding those prills to various fertilizer blends.
What was the “unexpected chemical reaction” that produced the SO2 release? Was it an explosion and fire? Burning sulphur produces SO2. The bigger the sulphur fire, the more SO2 will be released. Unless sufficiently heated, SO2 is heavier than air.
An unexpected chemical reaction? According to Tiger Sulphur’s very own material safety data sheet for sulphur (January 2004):
SECTION IV HAZARDS INFORMATION
Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards:
Dust suspended in air is readily ignited by flame, static electricity or friction spark. Every reasonable step must be taken to minimize dust formation. Dust tight casings should be equipped with explosion relief vents. Sparkless electrical equipment is recommended. Handling equipment must be grounded or bonded to avoid static electricity. Keep away from sources of flame or sparks. Detailed recommendations in Manufacturing Chemists Association SD-74 and National Safety Council 612 Bulletins covering “Sulphur” should be followed when handling Sulphur.SECTION IX HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS (Mixtures Only)
Material or Components:Mixtures with chlorates, nitrates or other oxidizing agents may be explosive.
As of the January 28, 2006 issue of the EUB’s Identification Code Licence Eligibility Report, Tiger Industries Limited no longer qualified for licence eligibility.
The source of the two news items is an Alberta Government information bulletin. The bulletin contains information important to anyone living close to a sulphur processing facility
Investigation after the incident determined that the release was the result of an unexpected chemical reaction during a production run of a sulphur-based fertilizer blend. The combination of un-degassed sulphur [that would have to be hydrogen sulfide?] and an impurity in a copper micronutrient [any guesses as to what that may have been?] resulted in a chemical reaction that produced significant quantities of sulphur dioxide.
It is odd that the chemical reaction is not described in the bulletin. Was it an explosion, perhaps a fire? More information can be obtained by writing to Josh Stewart, whose contact details are shown at the end of the Alberta Government information bulletin.
Posted in Fines & Penalties, Community & Industry, Explosions & Fires, Pollution: Health Issues | Print | No Comments »