You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day November 12, 2006.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (10)
- Alternative Energy Sources (16)
- Bruderheim Seniors (3)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (2)
- Climate Change (136)
- Community & Industry (76)
- Corruption & Fraud (9)
- Deficits and Debts (1)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (1)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (122)
- Energy Issues (10)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (24)
- Fines & Penalties (15)
- Gardening (1)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (2)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (14)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (45)
- Propaganda debunked (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (5)
- Town of Bruderheim (14)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (12)
- Wildlife (3)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- September 3, 2010: The IPCC and its relationship to the truth and objective science
- September 3, 2010: Vancouver: Sulphur fire sparks evacuation warning
- August 31, 2010: IPCC Climate "Science" -- Damaged Trust
- August 30, 2010: Bruderheim Seniors: Calendar of up-coming Events
- August 27, 2010: Soon to come to your neighbourhood tire store
- August 25, 2010: Pipeline expansion from Fort McMurray
- August 25, 2010: UK baby boom blamed on cold winter
- August 23, 2010: Canada's weather-service programs need repair
- August 23, 2010: Memoirs of a Disgusting Old Goat
- August 19, 2010: Leading US Physicist Labels Satellitegate Scandal a ‘Catastrophe’
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for November 12, 2006
Utilities take aim at sulfur emissions
November 12, 2006 by Walter Schneider.
Under federal pressure, Georgia Power and others are spending billions to cut back air pollution.
Quoted from the article: “Due in part to these controls, U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions are expected to be cut in half during the latter half of this decade — from 10.9 million tons in 2004 to a projected 5.9 million in 2010, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.” (Full Story)
_______________
Note by folc.ca: The cutting-back of 5 million tons of SO2 emissions annually means that enough storage for about an extra 1.6 million tons of sulphur (roughly 160 unit-sulphur trains of a 100 cars each fully loaded with waste sulphur) will have to be found each year. So, where will the US put all of that extra waste sulphur? Will it be cheaper for US sulphur consumers to use US-produced waste sulphur than to import Canadian waste sulphur? If so, where will Alberta put all of the sulphur it no longer will be able to sell to the US? Will that extra excess waste sulphur be put right smack into the centre of Lamont County?
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics, Sulphur-Dioxide | Print | No Comments »