You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for the day May 19, 2006.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (10)
- Alternative Energy Sources (16)
- Bruderheim Seniors (3)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (2)
- Climate Change (136)
- Community & Industry (76)
- Corruption & Fraud (9)
- Deficits and Debts (1)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (1)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (122)
- Energy Issues (10)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (24)
- Fines & Penalties (15)
- Gardening (1)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (2)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (14)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (45)
- Propaganda debunked (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (5)
- Town of Bruderheim (14)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (12)
- Wildlife (3)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- September 3, 2010: The IPCC and its relationship to the truth and objective science
- September 3, 2010: Vancouver: Sulphur fire sparks evacuation warning
- August 31, 2010: IPCC Climate "Science" -- Damaged Trust
- August 30, 2010: Bruderheim Seniors: Calendar of up-coming Events
- August 27, 2010: Soon to come to your neighbourhood tire store
- August 25, 2010: Pipeline expansion from Fort McMurray
- August 25, 2010: UK baby boom blamed on cold winter
- August 23, 2010: Canada's weather-service programs need repair
- August 23, 2010: Memoirs of a Disgusting Old Goat
- August 19, 2010: Leading US Physicist Labels Satellitegate Scandal a ‘Catastrophe’
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for May 19, 2006
Government shutdown of oilsands expansion spoils grand opening
May 19, 2006 by Walter Schneider.
James Stevenson
Canadian Press
Saturday, May 19, 2006
CALGARY (CP) - The planned grand opening next week of Syncrude Canada’s $8.4-billion expansion has been “significantly modified” in the wake of a government-ordered shutdown, as the oilsands giant focuses on finding the cause to noxious fumes escaping from the plant.
Syncrude’s so-called Stage 3 expansion, which would reinstate the joint venture as Canada’s largest oilsands producer, was in start-up mode when Alberta Environment ordered the shut down Thursday due to urine-like smells apparently emanating from new technology designed to eliminate sulphur-dioxide emissions…. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics, Sulphur-Related Construction Costs | Print | No Comments »
‘Body odour’ puts Syncrude’s $8.5B expansion on hold
May 19, 2006 by Walter Schneider.
Less-than-wholesome smells caused by recently installed coker on the fritz
Ben Gelinas
The Edmonton Journal; with files from Canwest News Service
Friday, May 19, 2006
EDMONTON - An $8.5-billion expansion by Syncrude Canada Ltd. has been idled after the oilsands giant was ordered to shut down new equipment Thursday because of noxious odours.
A new desulphurization unit at Mildred Lake 35 kilometres north of Fort McMurray was to have been officially opened next week.
But the strong smell it is not supposed to emit, like cat urine or body odour, continues to linger over Fort McMurray and Fort MacKay, causing eyes to water, heads to ache and Alberta Environment to issue an environmental protection order. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics | Print | No Comments »