You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for May, 2006.
- Acid Rain (13)
- Alternative Energy Sources (10)
- Bruderheim Seniors (1)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Climate Change (102)
- Community & Industry (65)
- Derailments (2)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (110)
- Energy Issues (7)
- Energy Purchases (3)
- Explosions & Fires (20)
- Fines & Penalties (13)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (10)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (18)
- Maps (1)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (13)
- Organizational News (1)
- Pollution: Health Issues (41)
- Sulphur Logistics (37)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (66)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (26)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Weather (7)
- World Sulphur Glut (19)
- March 10, 2010: Climate Astrology
- March 9, 2010: "Dirty Oil" -- Duck Images
- March 6, 2010: Alarmism vs. objective science
- March 6, 2010: Global-warming conference coming up
- March 4, 2010: Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
- February 21, 2010: John Coleman’s Global Warming Special #2
- February 8, 2010: "Green-Police" commercial gone ape
- January 31, 2010: Professor Ian Plimer on climate change
- January 31, 2010: Global Warming: the Collapse of a Grand Narrative
- January 30, 2010: CO2-warming is as impossible as is perpetual motion
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for May 2006
Cause of noxious fumes pinned down
May 26, 2006 by admin.
Canadian Press
Friday, May 26, 2006
CALGARY — Syncrude believes it has found the cause of the noxious fumes that precipitated a government-ordered shutdown of its $8.4-billion expansion in the northern Alberta oilsands, the joint venture’s largest shareholder said Friday.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust (TSX:COS.UN) said fixing the problem may take one to two months, but the capital costs associated with the modifications are expected to be “modest.”
Syncrude’s so-called Stage 3 expansion, which would reinstate the joint venture as Canada’s largest oilsands producer, was in start-up mode when Alberta Environment ordered the shut down last week due to urine-like smells apparently emanating from new technology designed to eliminate sulphur-dioxide emissions.
The shutdown involved Syncrude’s new Coker 8-3, one of three massive cokers used at the sprawling Syncrude site….
…the foul-smelling emissions were believed to be associated with the start-up of the flue gas desulphurizer (FGD), a new unit installed on the coker to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions…. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics, Sulphur-Related Construction Costs | Print | No Comments »
SDAB Hearing of Hazco’s Application
May 24, 2006 by admin.
Posted in Hazco EIA Review, Hazco | Print | No Comments »
Syncrude expansion opens
May 24, 2006 by admin.
Plant once on frontier now in the midst of global oil frenzy
Gordon Jaremko, The Edmonton Journal
Published: Wednesday, May 24, 2006
EDMONTON - When former Syncrude chairman Eric Newell conceived the $8.4-billion expansion the Fort McMurray plant celebrates finishing today, the oilsands were a fringe element…. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Sulphur-Related Construction Costs | Print | No Comments »
Government shutdown of oilsands expansion spoils grand opening
May 19, 2006 by admin.
James Stevenson
Canadian Press
Saturday, May 19, 2006
CALGARY (CP) - The planned grand opening next week of Syncrude Canada’s $8.4-billion expansion has been “significantly modified” in the wake of a government-ordered shutdown, as the oilsands giant focuses on finding the cause to noxious fumes escaping from the plant.
Syncrude’s so-called Stage 3 expansion, which would reinstate the joint venture as Canada’s largest oilsands producer, was in start-up mode when Alberta Environment ordered the shut down Thursday due to urine-like smells apparently emanating from new technology designed to eliminate sulphur-dioxide emissions…. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics, Sulphur-Related Construction Costs | Print | No Comments »
‘Body odour’ puts Syncrude’s $8.5B expansion on hold
May 19, 2006 by admin.
Less-than-wholesome smells caused by recently installed coker on the fritz
Ben Gelinas
The Edmonton Journal; with files from Canwest News Service
Friday, May 19, 2006
EDMONTON - An $8.5-billion expansion by Syncrude Canada Ltd. has been idled after the oilsands giant was ordered to shut down new equipment Thursday because of noxious odours.
A new desulphurization unit at Mildred Lake 35 kilometres north of Fort McMurray was to have been officially opened next week.
But the strong smell it is not supposed to emit, like cat urine or body odour, continues to linger over Fort McMurray and Fort MacKay, causing eyes to water, heads to ache and Alberta Environment to issue an environmental protection order. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics | Print | No Comments »
Syncrude expansion on hold
May 18, 2006 by admin.
Canadian Press
Thursday, May 18, 2006
FORT MCMURRAY, Alta. — Syncrude’s brand new, $8.4-billion oilsands expansion in northern Alberta is being temporarily shut down because of foul, urine-smelling emissions.
Alberta Environment issued an order Thursday afternoon calling on the joint-venture oilsands giant to immediately shut down its new “flue gas desulphurization unit and attached equipment,” related to the Mildred Lake plant located 40 kilometres north of Fort McMurray…. (Full Story — off-site)
Posted in Emission Incidents & Issues, Sulphur Logistics | Print | No Comments »
Notice of appeal hearing
May 5, 2006 by admin.
Lamont County: Notice of appeal hearing, re: request by HAZCO’s to have an adjournment of HAZCO’s appeal against the MPC’s April 2006 decision that denied HAZCO’s application.
Posted in Hazco EIA Review, Hazco | Print | No Comments »