You are currently browsing the Lamont County Environment weblog archives for April, 2006.
- Acid Rain (14)
- Alarmist Insanity (22)
- Alternative Energy Sources (32)
- Bruderheim Seniors (10)
- Bunker Fuel (9)
- Censorship (6)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Climate Change (175)
- Climate Craziness (8)
- Community & Industry (97)
- Corruption & Fraud (32)
- Deficits and Debts (5)
- Derailments (2)
- Electric Energy Prices (10)
- Emission Incidents & Issues (138)
- Energy Issues (27)
- Energy Newsletter (3)
- Energy Purchases (4)
- Explosions & Fires (28)
- Fines & Penalties (18)
- Gardening (2)
- Hazco (13)
- Hazco EIA Review (3)
- Health issues (17)
- Heavy-Metal Poisoning & Pollution (11)
- Humour (4)
- Hydrogen-Sulphide (20)
- Innovations (1)
- Maps (2)
- Nitrogen-Oxides (15)
- Organizational News (2)
- Pollution: Health Issues (53)
- Propaganda debunked (71)
- Shell CCS Project (20)
- Sulphur Logistics (38)
- Sulphur-Dioxide (68)
- Sulphur-Related Construction Costs (27)
- Taxes (13)
- The New World Order (10)
- Tips and Notes (2)
- Town of Bruderheim (21)
- Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel (18)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Weather (29)
- Wildlife (5)
- World Sulphur Glut (20)
- January 17, 2012: Alberta Electricity Consumers to Reduce Consumption
- January 8, 2012: Alberta Electricity Price-Rise Causes Run on Contracts
- January 4, 2012: Fred Singer: Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
- January 4, 2012: Is global warming a problem?
- December 20, 2011: Europe's Green Lobby Fighting For Survival
- November 5, 2011: CO2 advertising blitz by Alberta government
- October 27, 2011: CCS solutions start with the Government of Alberta?
- October 22, 2011: Longannet carbon capture and storage project is no more
- October 7, 2011: Costs jeopardize CO2 Capture and Storage Project
- September 28, 2011: Second thoughts on smart meters
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
Archive for April 2006
Alberta’s booming economy creating problems for Shell
April 29, 2006 by Walter Schneider.
Judy Monchuk
The Canadian Press
Saturday, April 29, 2006
CREDIT: Larry MacDougal, Canadian Press
PRESIDENT: Clive Mather, president and CEO of Shell Canada, talks to the media after the company’s annual general meeting in Calgary on Friday.
CALGARY - Shell Canada Ltd. (TSX:SHC) is reassessing projected costs of its oilsands development to account for labour shortages and soaring expenses in Alberta’s booming economy, the energy giant’s president said Friday….
Shell had two major projects come on stream earlier this year: upgrades to refineries in Montreal and on the outskirts of Edmonton which will process ultra low-sulphur diesel….(Full Story — off-site)
_____________
Note by folc.ca: Rising constructions costs are not all that plagues Shell and other oil producers.
“Ultra low-sulphur diesel” (ULSD) means more stringent removal of sulphur. That is about a 97% reduction of the sulphur contained in low-sulphur diesel (LSD). The very large reduction in sulphur content is based on the latest US EPA standard. (LSD sulphur content is 500ppm vs. a ULSD sulphur content of 15ppm)* The new standard has been adhered to for a number of years in countries other than Canada. Tarsands crude contains about 5 percent sulphur by mass (about 5.7kg per barrel), of which virtually all must be stripped before fuel produced from bitumen may be put on the market. Where will all of that waste sulphur go in a saturated world market? Will HAZCO dump it into the County of Lamont?
Tarsands oil production was 550,000 bpd in 1995, increased to 1.1 million bpd by 2004 and is expected to rise to 5 million bpd by 2030. We can therefore expect that the Tarsands oil producers will be looking for space to store the major portion of 28,500 tonnes of waste sulphur that will by that time be produced each day.
* Ultra-low sulfur diesel and the new 2006 US EPA regulations
(Canada will follow suit in about 2007)
Total sulphur consumption in the whole world is presently at about 60 million tons each year and not expected to rise much, if at all. By 2001 the world total sulphur inventory (stored waste sulphur) was close to 30 million tons and increasing at the rate of about 11 percent per year. At that rate of growth it will reach 220 million tons by 2030. (Source: Sulphur Surplus in the Making Impacts Refineries (2003), by R.J. Morris, The [US] Sulphur Institute)
Posted in World Sulphur Glut, Sulphur Logistics, Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel, Sulphur-Related Construction Costs | Print | No Comments »